borat should not be shot

the freak borat that my other friend wants shot should not be harmed in any way.
why? because i believe that borat is gay, and it's so sad to shoot gays.
gays are freaks, true. gays that look as disgusting as borat are doubly freakish. but that can't be a reason to shoot them.

if we are into shooting gays, it would mean that we have to shoot Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
and no one would want that wonderful person shot.

SHOOT John Mark Karr

here's a thought for all you freaks out there: if an even creepier freak admits to a crime so disgusting, that freak should be shot -- even if he or she did not actually commit the crime and only seeks narcissistic attention.
as for the psychopath, Karr, the choice is really a no-brainer.
he should be SHOT, and SHOT in the testicles first before shooting him in the head -- along with that other freak Borat (aka. Sacha Baron Cohen).

MY HELL

Creationists
Circle I Limbo

DMV Employees, NAMBLA Members
Circle II Whirling in a Dark & Stormy Wind

Greens, Geeks
Circle III Mud, Rain, Cold, Hail & Snow

Militant Vegans
Circle IV Rolling Weights

Rednecks
Circle V Stuck in Mud, Mangled

River Styx

General asshats
Circle VI Buried for Eternity

River Phlegyas

Goths, PETA Members
Circle VII Burning Sands

Scientologists
Circle IIX Immersed in Excrement

Osama bin Laden
Circle IX Frozen in Ice

Design your own hell

BRING BACK CORPORAL PUNISHMENT

oh yeah, that's the answer to a growing number of problems caused by IDIOTS.
by IDIOTS, i mean stupid criminals, incompetent employees, truant school children, almost anybody who causes problems simply because they are genetically predisposed to cause trouble.
and by corporal punishment, i mean whipping in the ass using a really, really big stick, preferrably hardwood or fire-hardened bamboo.
why would this work? because IDIOTS only respond to the most basic of biological instincts, of which avoiding pain is one of them. corporal punishment, or inflicting pain, may not work for everyone but it sure will work better than the pussy methods that modern "enlightened" thinkers have suggested and are being implemented now.
i say forget trying to be lenient to these people and hope that being nice to them will somehow reform them. i say whip them hard and whip them fast.
prisons today are so nice, much nicer than where some of these morons came from, that criminals almost want to get into them voluntarily. i say everytime you get out of line, you get a kick-ass whipping.
schools today are so tolerant and powerless against problem students, a majority of which are borderline retarded (the problem students). so instead of detention, i say a couple of dozen whacks with a fire-hardened bamboo. detentions are for pussies.

^_^

Millions of singles, no true love -- that's what those online services truly imply. I don't know the statistics on the success of these online dating services, but I would think it is much lower than actual (or physical) dating. Just think of it, how many do you think in every million of those who date or socialize online find true love?
And yet, for those who do the "old" process of dating where two people actually meet physically, the odds of finding true love can't be that small. Otherwise, there would have been hell of a lot more singles (percentage-wise) in the past than today -- which is not the case, as we are now at our loneliest than in any period in our history.
Why then do millions retreat to the virtual when success in finding meaningful relationships is higher in the real?
Perhaps it is because some of us, maybe even most of us, are insecure in our perception of who we are. The virtual world offers anonymity, the ability to tweak our "imperfect" selves, and the illusion of a "virtual barrier" that we believe could somehow lessen the pain of rejection. Plus it offers millions of choices.

Water, water, every where,
Nor any drop to drink
-- The Rime of the Ancient Mariner

the terrorists are winning

not only are they winning, we are happily making it easier for them to win. now, they DO NOT even have to carry out attacks. all they have to do is exhibit a threat and the rest of us scurry about creating our own chaos. what chaos? just try a transatlantic trip and you could very well experience europe barefoot or, worse, without your trusted Chanel perfume.

~~

A recent news from CNN says that Americans are becoming increasingly lonely. And what's suprising is that this increased social isolation affects almost everyone across the age spectrum -- from college students to the retirees.
It seems ironic that as the country's population is getting larger, and technology is making communication easier, more and more people seem to lose the ability to forge intimate relationships with other people. Instead, we have an increasing number of shallow "pseudo-relationships".
We have cellphones filled a gazzilion phone numbers, yet we never a meaningful conversation in a week. We receive thousands of emails a day, yet not one of them stirrs our hearts in the same way as a single handwritten note.
I spend hours in front of a computer, as I am now writing this. But do you think I'd be doing this if I have something better to do in the "real" world?

NASTY, NASTY CREATURES ARE WE

HUMANS!! so difficult, to figure out where we stand -- or what we really are. It's nice to believe (and it might also be true) that we are really nice deep down. you know, all the good and happy stuff, are really what we're made off. Then again, there is also that lingering thought (which might also turn out to be the case) that humans -- that's us -- are really NASTY, NASTY creatures. that we are capable of every evil we can conceive. not much of a leap in imagination to arrive at that -- we invented evil, after all.

It's true! if humans, homo sapiens, were never here on this planet, all the other species would never have the guts to invent the concept of evil. And a traveler from another world, where the concept of evil as we know it exists, would not have found it here in this planet had we, homo sapiens, never existed.

AND so here we are. back to the question. We know from experience and past events that our species is capable of the greatest good and the darkest evil. The question is: Which aspect of our selves is more incipient?

a bunch of pansies

how come the USA, the world's ONLY superpower, have difficulty dealing with a bunch of extremists inIraq and a handfull other places in the world?
i'll tell you why. it's because the "powers that be" who control the military might of the United States are a bunch of pansies!
extreme actions, such as what these terrorists have done, require extreme response. and it seems that the powers that be in the US of A do not have enough "mojo" to do what it takes to grind these extremists to the ground!